How is a Sustainalytics ESG risk rating score band interpreted?

QuestionsCategory: ESGHow is a Sustainalytics ESG risk rating score band interpreted?
1 Answers
Best Answer
Team GreenSutra Staff answered 2 days ago
Flat editorial night illustration on sustainalytics esg risk score: A tall vertical gauge column standing on a dark plain, divided into five stacked bands.

Morningstar Sustainalytics ESG Risk Ratings score unmanaged ESG risk on an absolute 0 to 100 scale across five bands: negligible 0 to 9.99, low 10 to 19.99, medium 20 to 29.99, high 30 to 39.99, and severe 40 and above. A lower score is better. Because the bands are absolute, scores compare across sectors.

The score measures what is left over, not what is being done. It blends a company’s exposure to material ESG issues with the management actions taken against them, and the residual gap between the two is the unmanaged risk that gets scored.

The five bands

Diagram, Five absolute risk bands. Band: Negligible, Low, Medium, High, Severe; Score range: 0 to 9.99, 10 to 19.99, 20 to 29.99, 30 to 39.99, 40 and above. A lower score is better
Five absolute risk bands
Band Score range
Negligible 0 to 9.99
Low 10 to 19.99
Medium 20 to 29.99
High 30 to 39.99
Severe 40 and above

The boundaries are exact rather than rounded. Writing them as 0 to 10 and 10 to 20 creates an overlap at every boundary and misstates where a company sits.

Why the direction is the opposite of a letter rating

A lower number is better, because the number counts risk rather than merit. This is the inverse of the MSCI construction, where a higher letter is stronger. Reversing the two is the single most common error when a company holds both ratings, and it produces exactly the wrong conclusion.

What absolute scoring changes

Because the categories are absolute rather than peer-relative, scores are comparable across sectors. A medium score means the same thing in cement as in software, which a relative rating cannot deliver. The trade-off is that a company in a high-impact industry cannot score well simply by outperforming its peers; the exposure is counted whatever the industry does on average.

That is why a company can sit in the Leader band on one provider’s scale and in a high-risk band on this one at the same time, with neither result being wrong.

Sources: Morningstar Sustainalytics ESG Risk Ratings methodology

Reducing an unmanaged risk score means evidencing management actions against identified exposures, which is a documentation exercise as much as an operational one. ESG solutions covers that evidence base, and the ESG risk assessment tool sets out the exposure areas the score is built from.